8. Các tài nguyên bổ sung thêm (cho chính sách truy cập mở)

Additional resources

Theo: https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Additional_resources

Xem thêm: Các thực hành tốt cho các chính sách của đại học

Xem thêm: Khoa học mở - Open Science

• Đây là phần trong Các thực hành tốt về các chính sách truy cập mở của đại học.

8.1. Các chính sách dạng được khuyến cáo trong chỉ dẫn này

Trật tự thời gian theo ngày tháng áp dụng. Các đường liên kết trỏ tới các chính sách, không phải trỏ tới các trang chủ của cơ sở.

Đối với những ai đang xem xét áp dụng các chính sách của riêng họ, chúng tôi khuyến cáo bắt đầu bằng chính sách mẫu của Harvard hiện hành, nó kết hợp các thực hành mới nhất được khuyến cáo trong chỉ dẫn này. các nhân viên dự án HOAP cũng sẵn sàng để tư vấn về phác thảo.

1. Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 12/02/2008
2. Harvard Law School, 1/05/2008
3. Stanford University School of Education, 26/06/2008
4. Harvard Kennedy School of Government, 10/03/2009
5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 18/3/2009. Được mở rộng, 6/4/2017.
6. University of Kansas, 30/04/2009
7. University of Oregon, Library Faculty, 7/05/2009
8. University of Oregon, Department of Romance Languages, 14/05/2009
9. Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1/06/2009
10. Trinity University, 27/10/2009
11. Oberlin College, 18/11/2009
12. Wake Forest University, Library Faculty, 1/02/2010
13. Harvard Business School, 12/02/2010
14. Rollins College, 25/02/2010
15. Duke University, 18/03/2010
16. University of Puerto Rico Law School, 24/03/2010
17. Harvard Divinity School, 15/11/2010
18. The University of Hawaii-Manoa, Faculty Senate tháng 12/2010, áp dụng lần mới nhất tháng 03/2012
19. Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 22/12/2010
20. Strathmore University, tháng 02/2011
21. Emory University, 15/03/2011
22. Harvard Graduate School of Design, 20/03/2011
23. Columbia University Libraries, 1/06/2011
24. Princeton University, 19/09/2011
25. Hope College, 15/10/2011
26. University of Illinois Chicago, Library Faculty, 21/11/2011
27. Bifröst University (tiếng Anh), hoặc tiếng Iceland, biểu quyết lần đầu vào tháng 05/2011; được khẳng định vào tháng 01/2012
28. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, tháng 03/2012
29. Ohio State University Libraries, 15/03/2012.
30. Utah State University, tháng 04/2012
31. Miami University of Ohio, Library faculty, 14/05/2012
32. University of California - San Francisco, 21/05/2012
33. University of Massachusetts Medical School, 27/07/2012
34. McGill University Librarians, tháng 10/2012.
35. Rutgers University, 19/10/2012
36. Harvard School of Public Health, 26/11/2012
37. Georgia Institute of Technology, 27/11/2012
38. Olin College of Engineering, 28/11/2012
39. University of Nairobi, tháng 12/2012
40. Wellesley College, 6/02/2013
41. College of Wooster, 4/03/2013
42. Amherst College, 5/03/2013
43. University of Rhode Island, 21/03/2013
44. Allegheny College, 16/05/2013
45. Stanford doctoral students at the Graduate School of Education, 24/05/2013
46. California Institute of Technology, 10/06/2013
47. Oregon State University, 13/06/2013
48. University of California, 24/07/2013; được tăng cường, 26/10/2015
49. Bryn Mawr College, 11/12/2013
50. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 1/07/2014
51. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), 7/10/2014
52. Harvard Medical School, 18/06/2014
53. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, 9/10/2014
54. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University, tháng 12/2014
55. University of Minnesota, tháng 12/2014
56. Boston University, 11/02/2015
57. University of Delaware, 6/04/2015
58. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 24/04/2015
59. Harvard University Center for the Environment, 1/07/2015
60. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 19/10/2015
61. University of Massachusetts Libraries, 6/01/2016.
62. Florida State University, 17/02/2016.
63. University of Arizona, 4/04/2016
64. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 7/04/2016
65. Middlebury College, 17/05/2016
66. University of Texas Libraries, 5/10/2016
67. Simon Fraser University, tháng 01/2017
68. Stony Brook University, 6/02/2017
69. Indiana University, 21/02/2017
70. Florida Gulf Coast University, 31/03/2017 (có hiệu lực 1/08/2017)

8.2. Các khuyến cáo khác cho chính sách OA của các đại học

• Roberto Barbera, Rita Ricceri, and Mario Torrisi, Guidelines to Setup and Configure an Appliance for the Development of Standard Compliant Open Access Repositories, Sci-GaIA (Energising Scientific Endeavour through Science Gateways and e-Infrastructures in Africa), August 2015.

• BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative), Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: setting the default to open, September 12, 2012. The ten-year anniversary statement from the BOAI, with recommendations for policy and practice.

• Martin Borchert and Paula Callan, Strategies for gaining and maintaining academic support for the institutional open access repository, April 14, 2013.

• COAPI (Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions), Public COAPI Toolkit of Open Access Policy Resources, first released March 2, 2016. Frequently updated.

• COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories), Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories, June 18, 2013.

• DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment), Inspiration and good practices, undated and apparently updated now and then.

• Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, Implementing Open Access Policies Using Institutional Repositories, chapter 5 of Pamela Bluh and Cindy Hepfer (eds.), The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges, American Library Association, Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS), January 2013.

• Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, Campus Open-Access Policy Implementation Models and Implications for IR Services, in Burton Callicott, David Scherer, and Andrew Wesolek (eds.), Making Institutional Repositories Work, Charleston Insights in Library, Archival, and Information Sciences, Purdue University Press, 2015, pp. 87-105.

• EOS (Enabling Open Scholarship), Formulating an institutional Open Access policy.

• EUA (European University Association), EUA's Open Access Checklist for Universities: A Practical Guide on Implementation, 2015.

• Stevan Harnad, Integrating Institutional and Funder Open Access Mandates: Belgian Model, Open Access Archivangelism, December 23, 2011.

• Stevan Harnad, Optimizing Open Access Policy, Serials Review, September 2015.

• Stevan Harnad, Waking OA's "Slumbering Giant": The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access, New Review of Information Networking, 14, 1 (2008) pp. 51-68.

• Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication, Harvard Model Open Access Policy. Annotated. Last updated, December 18, 2015.

• András Holl, Erika Bilicsi, and David Ball, Briefing Paper: Open Access mandate support, PASTEUR4OA, January 2016.

• Meg Hunt and Alma Swan, Open Access policy typology: A briefing paper for research institutions, PASTEUR4OA, September 2015.

• JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee), Implementing Open Access: some practical steps your institution can take, apparently first released in 2015. Periodically updated.

• JISC, Moving open access implementation forward: A handbook for open access good practice based on experiences of UK higher education institutions, December 2016.

• JISC, OA good practice initiative: Final project report, December 2016.

• JISC, OA good practice pathfinder update: Supporting universities’ open access implementation through sharing examples of good practice, Spring 2015.

• JISC, Open access good practice: Sharing examples of open access (OA) good practice to support universities in implementing OA as efficiently as possible, Archived November 30, 2016.

• JISC, Your institution and open access, June 2013.

• Danny Kingsley, Developing policies to support open access at your university, Working Paper, Australian National University, November 2010.

• MedOANet (Mediterranean Open Access Network), MedOANet Guidelines for implementing open access policies: For research performing and research funding organizations, November 2013. Now available in seven languages.

• OpenAIRE Guidelines for Literature Repositories, OpenAire, 2015.

• OASIS (Open Access Scholarly Information Sourcebook), Developing an Institutional Open Access Policy, April 7, 2012.

• RCAAP (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), Open Access Policies Kit, March 31, 2011.

• Bernard Rentier, Institutional repositories: it’s a matter of sticks and carrots, *Research, September 2015.

• Arthur Sale, Marc Couture, Eloy Rodrigues, Leslie Carr, and Stevan Harnad, Open Access Mandates and the "Fair Dealing" Button, in: Rosemary J. Coombe and Darren Wershler, eds., Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Culture Online, 2012.

• Stuart Shieber, The Occasional Pamphlet. Blog entries on scholarly communication.

• SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition), Responses to common misconceptions about campus open-access policies, n.d.

• Peter Suber, OA policy options for funding agencies and universities, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2009.

• Peter Suber Open Access, MIT Press, 2012, especially Chapter 4 on Policies. Also see the updates and supplements to Chapter 4.

• Peter Suber, Three principles for university open access policies, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, April 2, 2008.

• SUNScholar, Practical guidelines for starting an institutional repository, Stellenbosch University, July 2012.

• Alma Swan, Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access, UNESCO, March 2012.

• Sarah Tanksalvala, Running Effective Institutional Repositories: A Look at Best Practices, DuraSpace, June 15, 2016.

• Victoria Tsoukala and Marina Angelaki, Open Access Policy Guidelines for Research Performing Organizations, PASTEUR4OA, September 2015.

• UK OAIG (UK Open Access Implementation Group), Information and Guidance, December 2011.

8.3. Các chính sách OA cho đại học nói chung

• AOASG (Nhóm hỗ trợ truy cập mở người Úc) trang về các chính sách Truy cập Mở.

• Liên minh các Viện chính sách Truy cập Mở - COAPI (Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions), Institution Contacts Các địa chỉ liên hệ của các Viện và các chính sách truy cập mở của họ.

• Đăng ký Các chính sách Lưu trữ bắt buộc của các kho truy cập mở - ROARMAP (Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies). Danh sách toàn diện nhất các chỉ thị truy cập mở của đại học. Cũng bao gồm các chỉ thị OA của các cơ quan cấp vốn.

• UCác cuộc biểu quyết nhất trí của giáo viên cho các chính sách OA của đại học. Danh sách được Thư mục Truy cập Mở (Open Access Directory) duy trì.

• Các thư viện gắn thẻ thích hợp từ Dự án Theo dõi Truy cập Mở (Open Access Tracking Project). Chúng là các bộ sưu tập các cảnh báo cho các tin tức và bình luận về các chủ đề con nhất định về OA. Thư viện đối với từng thẻ là nguồn đám đông, được cập nhật theo thời gian thực, và sẵn sàng để đi theo như là bộ nuôi RSS, bộ nuôi Atom, bộ nuôi JSON, hoặc trang HTML được tổ chức giống blog:
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.best_practices" (các hạng mục về các thực hành OA tốt nhất, bao gồm cả các thực hành tốt nhất về tất cả các chủ đề có liên quan tới OA, không chỉ các chính sách OA của đại học)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.case.policies.universities" (các trường hợp điển hình của các chính sách OA của đại học)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.case.repositories" (các trường hợp điển hình của các kho OA)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.compliance" (các hạng mục tuân thủ với các chính sách OA)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.deposits" (các hạng mục về ký gửi tác phẩm trong các kho OA)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.ir" (các hạng mục về các kho của cơ sở)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.mandates" (các hạng mục về các chỉ thị OA, bao gồm cả các chỉ thị của các nhà cấp vốn, không chỉ các chỉ thị của đại học)
  • Các hạng mục được gắn thẻ "oa.policies" (các hạng mục về các chính sách OA, bao gồm cả các chính sách của các nhà cấp vốn, chứ không chỉ các chính sách của đại học)

• This is a section within Good practices for university open-access policies.

Policies of the kind recommended in the guide

Chronological by date of adoption. Links point to policies, not institutional home pages.

For those considering adopting their own policies, we recommend starting with the current Harvard model policy, which incorporates the latest recommended practices described in this guide. HOAP project staff are available for consultation on drafting as well.

1. Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences, February 12, 2008
2. Harvard Law School, May 1, 2008
3. Stanford University School of Education, June 26, 2008
4. Harvard Kennedy School of Government, March 10, 2009
5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), March 18, 2009. Extended, April 6, 2017.
6. University of Kansas, April 30, 2009
7. University of Oregon, Library Faculty, May 7, 2009
8. University of Oregon, Department of Romance Languages, May 14, 2009
9. Harvard Graduate School of Education, June 1, 2009
10. Trinity University, October 27, 2009
11. Oberlin College, November 18, 2009
12. Wake Forest University, Library Faculty, February 1, 2010
13. Harvard Business School, February 12, 2010
14. Rollins College, February 25, 2010
15. Duke University, March 18, 2010
16. University of Puerto Rico Law School, March 24, 2010
17. Harvard Divinity School, November 15, 2010
18. The University of Hawaii-Manoa, Faculty Senate December 2010, Final adoption March 2012
19. Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, December 22, 2010
20. Strathmore University, c. February 2011
21. Emory University, March 15, 2011
22. Harvard Graduate School of Design, March 20, 2011
23. Columbia University Libraries, June 1, 2011
24. Princeton University, September 19, 2011
25. Hope College, October 15, 2011
26. University of Illinois Chicago, Library Faculty, November 21, 2011
27. Bifröst University (in English), or in Icelandic, first vote May 2011; confirmed January 2012
28. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, c. March 2012
29. Ohio State University Libraries, March 15, 2012.
30. Utah State University, April 2012
31. Miami University of Ohio, Library faculty, May 14, 2012
32. University of California - San Francisco, May 21, 2012
33. University of Massachusetts Medical School, July 27, 2012
34. McGill University Librarians, c. October 2012.
35. Rutgers University, October 19, 2012
36. Harvard School of Public Health, November 26, 2012
37. Georgia Institute of Technology, November 27, 2012
38. Olin College of Engineering, November 28, 2012
39. University of Nairobi, December 2012
40. Wellesley College, February 6, 2013
41. College of Wooster, March 4, 2013
42. Amherst College, March 5, 2013
43. University of Rhode Island, March 21, 2013
44. Allegheny College, May 16, 2013
45. Stanford doctoral students at the Graduate School of Education, May 24, 2013
46. California Institute of Technology, June 10, 2013
47. Oregon State University, June 13, 2013
48. University of California, July 24, 2013; strengthened, October 26, 2015
49. Bryn Mawr College, December 11, 2013
50. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), July 1, 2014
51. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), October 7, 2014
52. Harvard Medical School, June 18, 2014
53. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, October 9, 2014
54. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University, December 2014
55. University of Minnesota, December 2014
56. Boston University, February 11, 2015
57. University of Delaware, April 6, 2015
58. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, April 24, 2015
59. Harvard University Center for the Environment, July 1, 2015
60. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 19, 2015
61. University of Massachusetts Libraries, January 6, 2016.
62. Florida State University, February 17, 2016.
63. University of Arizona, April 4, 2016
64. University of Massachusetts Amherst, April 7, 2016
65. Middlebury College, May 17, 2016
66. University of Texas Libraries, October 5, 2016
67. Simon Fraser University, January 2017
68. Stony Brook University, February 6, 2017
69. Indiana University, February 21, 2017
70. Florida Gulf Coast University, March 31, 2017 (to take effect August 1, 2017)

Other recommendations for university OA policies

• Roberto Barbera, Rita Ricceri, and Mario Torrisi, Guidelines to Setup and Configure an Appliance for the Development of Standard Compliant Open Access Repositories, Sci-GaIA (Energising Scientific Endeavour through Science Gateways and e-Infrastructures in Africa), August 2015.

• BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative), Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: setting the default to open, September 12, 2012. The ten-year anniversary statement from the BOAI, with recommendations for policy and practice.

• Martin Borchert and Paula Callan, Strategies for gaining and maintaining academic support for the institutional open access repository, April 14, 2013.

• COAPI (Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions), Public COAPI Toolkit of Open Access Policy Resources, first released March 2, 2016. Frequently updated.

• COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories), Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories, June 18, 2013.

• DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment), Inspiration and good practices, undated and apparently updated now and then.

• Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, Implementing Open Access Policies Using Institutional Repositories, chapter 5 of Pamela Bluh and Cindy Hepfer (eds.), The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges, American Library Association, Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS), January 2013.

• Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, Campus Open-Access Policy Implementation Models and Implications for IR Services, in Burton Callicott, David Scherer, and Andrew Wesolek (eds.), Making Institutional Repositories Work, Charleston Insights in Library, Archival, and Information Sciences, Purdue University Press, 2015, pp. 87-105.

• EOS (Enabling Open Scholarship), Formulating an institutional Open Access policy.

• EUA (European University Association), EUA's Open Access Checklist for Universities: A Practical Guide on Implementation, 2015.

• Stevan Harnad, Integrating Institutional and Funder Open Access Mandates: Belgian Model, Open Access Archivangelism, December 23, 2011.

• Stevan Harnad, Optimizing Open Access Policy, Serials Review, September 2015.

• Stevan Harnad, Waking OA's "Slumbering Giant": The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access, New Review of Information Networking, 14, 1 (2008) pp. 51-68.

• Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication, Harvard Model Open Access Policy. Annotated. Last updated, December 18, 2015.

• András Holl, Erika Bilicsi, and David Ball, Briefing Paper: Open Access mandate support, PASTEUR4OA, January 2016.

• Meg Hunt and Alma Swan, Open Access policy typology: A briefing paper for research institutions, PASTEUR4OA, September 2015.

• JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee), Implementing Open Access: some practical steps your institution can take, apparently first released in 2015. Periodically updated.

• JISC, Moving open access implementation forward: A handbook for open access good practice based on experiences of UK higher education institutions, December 2016.

• JISC, OA good practice initiative: Final project report, December 2016.

• JISC, OA good practice pathfinder update: Supporting universities’ open access implementation through sharing examples of good practice, Spring 2015.

• JISC, Open access good practice: Sharing examples of open access (OA) good practice to support universities in implementing OA as efficiently as possible, Archived November 30, 2016.

• JISC, Your institution and open access, June 2013.

• Danny Kingsley, Developing policies to support open access at your university, Working Paper, Australian National University, November 2010.

• MedOANet (Mediterranean Open Access Network), MedOANet Guidelines for implementing open access policies: For research performing and research funding organizations, November 2013. Now available in seven languages.

• OpenAIRE Guidelines for Literature Repositories, OpenAire, 2015.

• OASIS (Open Access Scholarly Information Sourcebook), Developing an Institutional Open Access Policy, April 7, 2012.

• RCAAP (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), Open Access Policies Kit, March 31, 2011.

• Bernard Rentier, Institutional repositories: it’s a matter of sticks and carrots, *Research, September 2015.

• Arthur Sale, Marc Couture, Eloy Rodrigues, Leslie Carr, and Stevan Harnad, Open Access Mandates and the "Fair Dealing" Button, in: Rosemary J. Coombe and Darren Wershler, eds., Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Culture Online, 2012.

• Stuart Shieber, The Occasional Pamphlet. Blog entries on scholarly communication.

• SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition), Responses to common misconceptions about campus open-access policies, n.d.

• Peter Suber, OA policy options for funding agencies and universities, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, February 2, 2009.

• Peter Suber Open Access, MIT Press, 2012, especially Chapter 4 on Policies. Also see the updates and supplements to Chapter 4.

• Peter Suber, Three principles for university open access policies, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, April 2, 2008.

• SUNScholar, Practical guidelines for starting an institutional repository, Stellenbosch University, July 2012.

• Alma Swan, Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access, UNESCO, March 2012.

• Sarah Tanksalvala, Running Effective Institutional Repositories: A Look at Best Practices, DuraSpace, June 15, 2016.

• Victoria Tsoukala and Marina Angelaki, Open Access Policy Guidelines for Research Performing Organizations, PASTEUR4OA, September 2015.

• UK OAIG (UK Open Access Implementation Group), Information and Guidance, December 2011.

University OA policies in general

• AOASG (Australasian Open Access Support Group) page on Open Access Policies.

• COAPI (Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions), Institution Contacts and their Open Access Policies.

• ROARMAP (Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies). The most comprehensive list of university OA mandates. Also includes funding-agency OA mandates.

• Unanimous faculty votes for university OA policies. A list maintained by the Open Access Directory.

• Relevant tag libraries from the Open Access Tracking Project. These are collections of alerts to news and comment on certain OA subtopics. The library for each tag is crowd-sourced, updated in real time, and available for following as an RSS feed, Atom feed, JSON feed, or on an HTML page organized like a blog:
  • Items tagged with "oa.best_practices" (items on OA best practices, including best practices on all OA-related topics, not just university OA policies)
  • Items tagged with "oa.case.policies.universities" (case studies of university OA policies)
  • Items tagged with "oa.case.repositories" (case studies of OA repositories)
  • Items tagged with "oa.compliance" (items on compliance with OA policies)
  • Items tagged with "oa.deposits" (items on depositing work in OA repositories)
  • Items tagged with "oa.ir" (items on institutional repositories)
  • Items tagged with "oa.mandates" (items on OA mandates, including funder mandates, not just university mandates)
  • Items tagged with "oa.policies" (items on OA policies, including funder policies, not just university policies)

Dịch: Lê Trung Nghĩa

letrungnghia.foss@gmail.com